Welcome to the news section of our website. Read about our latest industry and court news and stay up to date with changes in relevant legislation to our services.
Available upon request.
05/01/2018
Yisroel Greenburg, advocate on the Southeastern Circuit, considers the High Court’s decision in Mulalley & Company Ltd v Regent Building Services Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 2962 (Ch) and when an adjournment may be permitted on medical grounds.
Read more
21/12/2017
Raghav Trivedi, advocate on the Midlands Circuit, considers Mr Justice Morris’ recent judgment in Philip Davies v Carillion Energy Services Limited & His Energy Limited (In Liquidation) [2017] EWHC 3206 (QB)
Read more
14/12/2017
The Ministry of Justice has published the county court statistics for the 3rd quarter of 2017. They reveal a significant increase in the number of specified and unspecified money claims being issued over the last 12 months (13% and 10% respectively).
Read more
12/12/2017
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Budana v. The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 1980 will be of enormous importance to many firms undertaking personal injury claims for Claimants.
Read more
04/12/2017
In a recent Case Management Conference (Freeborn v. Marcal [2017] EWHC 3046 (TC)), Mr Justice Coulson was required to decide whether or not a sanction had been imposed, before considering the Defendant’s application for relief from that sanction.
Read more
24/11/2017
A decision of Mr Justice Nugee to make a costs management order during the course of the “HBOS Shareholder” litigation, Sharp & others v. Lloyds Banking Group & Others [2017] EWHC 141, has recently been published.
Read more
17/11/2017
The Annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey reveals that 76% of medical expert witnesses are not prepared to accept instructions from litigants in person
Read more
10/11/2017
HMCTS have announced that the Bristol Civil Justice Centre will re-open on Tuesday 14 November 2017.
Read more
03/11/2017
The Court of Appeal has ruled that despite there being no reference to ‘fundamental dishonesty’ in a defence or during cross examination at trial, this is no bar to the Court still making a finding of fundamental dishonesty.
Read more